Will It Do Any Good?
Published on February 20, 2005 By TheFazz In Politics
Apparently in a follow-up to Condoleezza Rice's week-long diplomatic trip to Europe earlier this month, Bush too will be trying to mend European-American relations. On the outside, this looks like a great plan. First stunning the European leaders with Rice's eloquence, then having the president himself do some diplomacy. Bush will visit Brussels, speak to Putin, Chirac, Schroeder, Blair, and others. Although diplomacy is never a bad thing, we don't know if this will work.

Europe and America have two entirely different cultures. One is staunchly liberal and socialist, while the other is more focused on faith, family, and freedom. The two cultures also look at each other in much different ways. To Europeans, Americans are a Bible-thumping, war-mongering, arrogant, ignorant, and rash bunch. To Americans, Europeans are lily-livered, weak-willed degenerates. No amount of diplomacy in Bush's second term can do anything to close this ever widening cultural rift. The effects of this trip will be confined to the governments themselves, many of which might not have the same leaders in another 5 years, and it will not affect the actual populaces' viewpoints.

However, these leaders may not even be affected by our envoy to Europe. Do you actually think Jacques Chirac will listen to Bush with an open mind? Bush's pleas of mending fences will fall on the deaf ears of Europe's diplomats and dignitaries. Only Blair and perhaps Berlusconi will listen to Bush, but they are not the ones we need to mend fences with. France, Spain, and Germany are the ones we most need to work with, but they will most likely just nod their heads to what Bush says and forget they ever had the talks a week from now.

In addition to the above reasons, our goals in this trip are not easy to achieve. The main focus will be on Iran, climate control and global warming, and arms sales to China. Europe will not budge on Iran no matter how persuasive their American counterparts are. Their goal is clear: "do not let Iran get nuclear weapons, but if they do, oh well." Global warming is an issue the US will not change their minds about. It is obvious that Bush will never sign the Kyoto Protocol, much to the displeasure of Europe. As for arms sales to China, we well know that European governments will go where the money is, and if that means selling weapons to China, so be it.

Sadly, this ambitious and well-intentioned trip to Europe may not go as well as we hoped. There are much too big of disagreements between the two cultures for one trip to fix. Europe's leaders probably won't heed what Bush says, either. And, finally, the issues are of too large a scale for the two powers to unite on. We can still hope for the best. We can still hope that Europe and America will reconcile. What can we do but hope?


Comments (Page 2)
2 Pages1 2 
on Feb 22, 2005
With the way Russia is going, I have no fear of it taking our position. Tsar Putin isn't doing such a great job at advancing his country.

And we care what you think, to an extent. If we feel threatened by something, there is no way we will ask Europe's permission first. Of course, Europe doesn't have to ask for our permission to act.
on Feb 22, 2005
Great article with interesting points! I think most Europeans still like Americans(after all we have done quite a bit for them over the past century) However they simply abhor Bush. Perhaps After '08 if we get a more charasmatic leader in charge of diplomacy and our country then they will again lay down there signs and get along. But the EU urged on by French President Chirac is at least trying to become much more independant of US money. Over time I feel that it will become not so much a question of should we mend our relationships but simply, we need to do something.
on Feb 22, 2005
Good points DNCDude.

And in a bold move today, NATO has agreed to help the training of Iraqi troops. That is a big victory for Bush's diplomatic trip, one which I did not foresee. And France, in all its glory, is sending one officer over there to train the troops! I guess it is better than doing nothing, so I won't complain much.
on Feb 23, 2005
Reply By: TheFazzPosted: Tuesday, February 22, 2005Good points DNCDude.And in a bold move today, NATO has agreed to help the training of Iraqi troops. That is a big victory for Bush's diplomatic trip, one which I did not foresee. And France, in all its glory, is sending one officer over there to train the troops! I guess it is better than doing nothing, so I won't complain much.


I am glad only one frenchman is going over there to train Iraqis after all it just takes one frenchman to show how to surrender properly,he will teach Iraq the world famous, french/europe "run away and hide stratigy" or maybe help them build the iraqi magional line,
on Feb 23, 2005
Ha, at this point perhaps the Maginot Line could be used in Iraq. Then again...
2 Pages1 2